| COMMENTS (16) | | 08/01/2010 | | I have to agree with the poster above. I live 21 miles from Roanoke Va and have never had consistant reception. Even with 4 or 5 bars, signals will pixilate, out completely, and the sync is not accurate at times.. I see the same with stations in the Greensboro/Winston Salem market. In addition, I use a high gain panel antenna, and all stations have UHF authorizations. It's also amazing how the signal strength can vary from day to day. When it works, the quality is very good, but still the addage applies "garbage in, garbage out". I'd take back analog any day! |
| | 01/22/2010 | | Find television transmitters with these web sites. dtv.gov , tvfool.com |
| | 10/20/2009 | | In Florida, there is a station in West Palm Beach broading on Channel 27 and in Orlando, just 170 miles away also broading on Channel 27. When a weather system comes through, reception is impossible. |
| | 09/25/2009 | | There are many players in the reception problem scenario that need to share the blame for all of the reception issues that we are now seeing. The FCC, NTIA (National Telecommunications and Information Administration), the CEA (Consumer Electronics Association), as well as the NAB (National Association of Broaders) all need to admit that the DTV transition did not go as well as hoped, and that they all contributed to the confusion that the consumers are now dealing with.
Just like every big project they tackle, this one had many blunders that led to all of the issues we are now dealing with. The converter box coupon program was one of the leading promoters of mis-information that has caused lots of the confusion we are now seeing among consumers.
The FCC website has always stated that in order to receive broad TV signals reliably, you need a properly selected antenna installed at least 30 feet above the surrounding terrain. Can someone please explain why "Rabbit Ears" were always promoted in the DTV answers commercials that we were deluged with for almost 2 years, even when the reception issues were well known very early in the game?
Even those who were not going to use converter boxes were led to believe that "Rabbit Ears" would provide adequate reception, even when all of the DTV testing was done with antennas mounted 30 feet in the air.
The main enemies of DTV reception seem to be VHF power levels, improper antenna selection, the belief that indoor antennas work well in every situation, Multi-path or ghosting, and antenna amplifiers that are of poor quality and were designed mainly for analog signal reception.
It has damaged the reputation of TV broading in general, when digital TV broading is actually a good concept that works quite well with the proper equipment, but it was promoted incorrectly and it will be quite some time before all of the misconceptions are dispelled.
|
| | 09/19/2009 | | Just because a station calls itself "Fox4", for example, does not mean that it is actually transmitting on channel 4. We in the Dallas/Fort Worth area of Texas have a station that calls itself channel 52 but transmits on channel 9. Only two stations transmit on the channel that they claim that they are on. Thanks to the FCC for "virtual channels" so it is a little harder to determine the problem for the layman. |
|
|