homeIndexpage

Fixing VHF DTV Reception Problems

From Doug Lung's RF Report

06.19.2009



Some VHF DTV stations have had significant problems with the DTV transition. Affected markets include Chicago, Philadelphia, and Washington D.C. While many of the news reports focused on ABC affiliates' difficulties in these markets, ABC wasn't the only network affected. NBC affiliate WHDH-TV in Boston had so many problems after moving to DTV Channel 7 that it applied for, and received, authority to move back to its original DTV Channel 42 until matters could be resolved. Fox affiliate WSVN, operating on Channel 7 in Miami, requested special temporary authority to increase power from its authorized 31 kW to 63 kW. CBS affiliate WJZ-TV Channel 13 in Baltimore, requested authority to increase power from 9.8 kW to 27.5 kW.

What is the solution to the VHF DTV reception problem?

Increased power helps. Many of the stations experiencing problems were operating at relatively low power. Circular polarization also helps. In Dallas, reception of WFAA improved after it moved from a pre-transition horizontally polarized antenna on Channel 9 at 18.5 kW to its post-transition Channel 8 with circular polarization at 45 kW.

Having the correct receiving antenna is also important. Most of the VHF DTV problems occurred in markets where there were no VHF DTV stations before June 12. Even rabbit ears are better than a bow-tie at VHF. Electrical interference is an issue. I had no problem receiving all the Los Angeles VHF DTV stations (channels 7, 9, 11, and 13) using a Winegard SS-3000 antenna with its preamplifier indoors, without line of sight to Mount Wilson. KCAL-TV, on Channel 9, took some hits until I moved the antenna to put a light fixture with compact fluorescent bulbs in a null. UHF reception was excellent. I took some photos of spectrum analyzer plots showing the VHF and UHF DTV spectrum before, during and after the DTV transition. Look for them in my next RF Technology column.




KYW NewsRadio reporter John Ostapkovich talked to RF expert Oded Bendov about VHF DTV reception problems. In his article Transmitter Expert Not Surprised by DTV Transition Woes, “The FCC has done very poor engineering and assigned Channel six and other channels in the VHF much lower power than they should have,” Bendov said. “For example, in the case of Channel six, they probably need as much as 15 times more power in the transmitter than they have now."

Bendov said that finding a UHF channel for channel 6 (WPVI-TV in Philadelphia) and “others in this pickle” might be the only solution.

While VHF DTV problems received a lot of attention in the press, I heard of cases where people in terrain-obstructed locations that were unable to receive UHF DTV were able to receive the VHF signals after stations returned to their VHF analog channel. VHF has its advantages—less power consumption, less attenuation from terrain and foliage, and the ability to use solid state transmitters, even at the maximum allowed effective radiated power—but it requires the viewer to use the appropriate indoor antenna or, in some cases, a large outdoor antenna.

Resolving VHF DTV reception problems will require action by stations and consumers. Stations will need to transmit the maximum power allowed and to request additional power if possible. Circular polarization provides a way to improve reception on UHF-only antennas by coupling into feed lines and phasing lines (in a bow-tie array). Consumers will need to use antennas that are large enough to effectively receive VHF signals and, if indoors, locate them to avoid interference from other electronic devices.



SPONSORED LINKS
 
 
 

COMMENTS (16)
08/01/2010
I have to agree with the poster above. I live 21 miles from Roanoke Va and have never had consistant reception. Even with 4 or 5 bars, signals will pixilate, out completely, and the sync is not accurate at times.. I see the same with stations in the Greensboro/Winston Salem market. In addition, I use a high gain panel antenna, and all stations have UHF authorizations. It's also amazing how the signal strength can vary from day to day. When it works, the quality is very good, but still the addage applies "garbage in, garbage out". I'd take back analog any day!

01/22/2010
Find television transmitters with these web sites. dtv.gov , tvfool.com

10/20/2009
In Florida, there is a station in West Palm Beach broading on Channel 27 and in Orlando, just 170 miles away also broading on Channel 27. When a weather system comes through, reception is impossible.

09/25/2009
There are many players in the reception problem scenario that need to share the blame for all of the reception issues that we are now seeing. The FCC, NTIA (National Telecommunications and Information Administration), the CEA (Consumer Electronics Association), as well as the NAB (National Association of Broaders) all need to admit that the DTV transition did not go as well as hoped, and that they all contributed to the confusion that the consumers are now dealing with. Just like every big project they tackle, this one had many blunders that led to all of the issues we are now dealing with. The converter box coupon program was one of the leading promoters of mis-information that has caused lots of the confusion we are now seeing among consumers. The FCC website has always stated that in order to receive broad TV signals reliably, you need a properly selected antenna installed at least 30 feet above the surrounding terrain. Can someone please explain why "Rabbit Ears" were always promoted in the DTV answers commercials that we were deluged with for almost 2 years, even when the reception issues were well known very early in the game? Even those who were not going to use converter boxes were led to believe that "Rabbit Ears" would provide adequate reception, even when all of the DTV testing was done with antennas mounted 30 feet in the air. The main enemies of DTV reception seem to be VHF power levels, improper antenna selection, the belief that indoor antennas work well in every situation, Multi-path or ghosting, and antenna amplifiers that are of poor quality and were designed mainly for analog signal reception. It has damaged the reputation of TV broading in general, when digital TV broading is actually a good concept that works quite well with the proper equipment, but it was promoted incorrectly and it will be quite some time before all of the misconceptions are dispelled.

09/19/2009
Just because a station calls itself "Fox4", for example, does not mean that it is actually transmitting on channel 4. We in the Dallas/Fort Worth area of Texas have a station that calls itself channel 52 but transmits on channel 9. Only two stations transmit on the channel that they claim that they are on. Thanks to the FCC for "virtual channels" so it is a little harder to determine the problem for the layman.

More...     
Leave a Comment:
 
Text Only 2000 characters limit
Enter the word as it is shown in the box below: (Why?)
(case sensitive)